Sunday, January 12, 2014

My Favourtie Composer


I went to university from 1966-67 to 1969-70. In the fall of 1968, a new professor joined the faculty. She was Czechoslovakian, with a doctorate in music and experience in teaching, and had managed to get out of Prague just before the Russian tanks rolled in to put down the uprising known as the Prague Spring. She made it to Canada and was hired to teach my music history class.

She was very intelligent and had an excellent command of English, so much so that sometimes some of us scurried to a dictionary to look up a word she used. However, she had quite a thick accent and at first, her classes consisted of her just reading her lecture from her notes rather than winging it, because she had not yet settled down to feel comfortable in her new job and her new country. That meant for the first term her classes were dry and a bit boring, largely because much of what she said was delivered in a slight monotone as she read from her notes, and it was also not easy to cut through her heavy accent.


One day that fall was a particularly warm day and I was sitting at the back of the class feeling very sleepy. So as her lecture proceeded, I entered into a monumental battle with myself to stay awake. My head would fall and I'd catch myself and suddenly sit up, open my eyes wide, but soon nod off again.
 
As I nodded of yet again, I could hear her mention this composer by the name of Austin Sibley, and I had never heard of him before. ZZZZ, back to sleep I went. But again she kept talking about Austin Sibley and it seemed to me that she was attaching some importance to him. So I quickly jotted the name, Austin Sibley, in my notes and vowed to head up to the library after class to look him up. Back to sleep I went.
 
As I nodded off yet again, I fantasized about who this guy might be. He sounded English and I imagined some obscure organist living out his entire life in a dusty organ loft in the middle of Britain churning out masterpiece after masterpiece in organ and choral music, and no one knew who he was until all this prodigious output was discovered long after his death. Again I wrote down the name Austin Sibley. I got the impression that this professor was putting Austin Sibley on a par with Handel. That's how important Austin Sibley sounded to me, and I felt a bit ashamed that I had never heard of him.
 
After the class ended, I needed a coffee to wake up and headed off the to student common room to get one. As I sat with a couple of my colleagues and talked, I asked about that last class and this composer, Austin Sibley, the professor kept mentioning over and over. Everyone started laughing, for there is no composer by the name of Austin Sibley. The professor was simply using the word, ostensibly, probably her new English word of the day.
 
Then this story spread like wildfire all over the music building and for the rest of the day, everyone was calling me Austin Sibley. Well, I managed to laugh if off so that it all blew over and I managed to live it down by the end of the day.
 
However, to this day, whenever anyone asks me who my favourite composer is, I answer, in the snootiest voice I can muster, Austin Sibley! - He is certainly the most under-appreciated composer in history, but you mark my words: Eventually his time will come.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Hatcher


The cat on my lap is grey, with a frank, white face, and he doesn’t seem to mind his blindness at all. Certainly, he has no idea how close to an end his blindness brought him. That, and the move to the new house.

His name is Hatcher, and why we settled on that title I’ll never know. Twelve years with our friend, and neither Ellen nor I were able to remember how the name came about. It is my contention that it had something to do with a mystery show on television at the time, but Ellen thinks the Arnold couple’s child had named all the kittens before they started doling them out to friends and neighbours like us. She said he came to us as Hatcher, and surely, whatever the case, that’s what he remained, forevermore – Hatcher.

Because of that same child – a young man by now – they had not “put down” the one blind kitten in the litter. The child, his own name forgotten here in the years since the Arnolds moved to Milwaukee, had protested all too loudly and vehemently at any such thought.

So, Hatcher it’s been all these years, and he answers to it all right, ears immediately a twitch and face turning in open inquiry at any mention of his name, even in sotto voce voice, as lately we were forced to adopt. It was his future, as well as ours, that was under discussion. The pending move was serious business, and we argued over it long and earnestly – not really quarreling, but gnawing at it, again and again.

The trouble was, with the children grown and gone, the sensible choice was to sell the big house and move into something smaller, enough just for us and perhaps the occasional guest in the spare bedroom, and that’s all. Despite its set of stairs, a duplex garden apartment, euphemistically called a town house in these parts, was the obvious ticket. Rather than “apartment living,” it appeared to be a house, it did have two floors and that set of stairs – they were the selling point.

But now we had to consider Hatcher, undeniably old and greying like ourselves, but in his case also blind. Was it fair to him? Not simply the move, for personal finances dictated that choice for us . . . no, not the move itself, but the fact that he would be bumping about a new house, for him an alien territory full of confusion, even danger, for he is blind, and he is old, and how would he ever adapt all over again?

It troubled us both to picture him turning a corner and bumping smack into a dresser, a wall, or a closed closet door. With the furniture all rearranged in new quarters, the jumps he had spent a lifetime learning, his precision uncanny, no longer would be the same. And the stairs – how long before he would learn exactly where they began? It hurts us both deeply to imagine the poor fellow, if we were fumbling at the outside lock on the door, to come running in his usual style of greeting – only to tumble down an unfamiliar set of stairs.

“It just wouldn’t be fair to him,” Ellen had grieved, and I with her. It wouldn’t, no. You can’t ask an old dog to learn new tricks – not when he’s a cat, already blind, somewhat infirm, and plunked down in an environment totally foreign to him. It just wouldn’t be fair to him, all right. Those dreaded words . . . but we spoke them. Yes, “putting him down” would be only humane.

It was a temptation to say, well, this is going to hurt us as much as him – more so in fact, because he’ll never know, and we will. And we surely would have . . . he was like a fourth child, as integral to our lives and earthly existence as any other member of the family we counted as ours. Only this was one child that never would grow up, marry, find a job, and move away. This was one child that was ours ’till death us do part. Only now it was our choice to take that step, that parting step, in all “fairness” to him, to Hatcher.

Well, said the others, children among them, their pragmatism surprisingly cruel, do it – and get another cat after the move. You’ll come to love it, too. Get a kitten, why don’t you? And watch it grow up and become a part of your new life together – like Hatcher did, once.

Sure. Just go out and find another Hatcher, right? Find another cat with the odd habit of waking you by a tongue that rasps on your nose, another that licks his canned cat food daintily, like a child on his best behaviour with an ice cream cone, then drags a chunk out of his dish and simply eats it off the floor. Sure . . . just go find another one inordinately graceful in every move, yet hilariously absurd – and unconsciously vulnerable – in his sleeping postures on side or back, endless in their variety.

And all those years in the big house, where he grew up – sure-footed and certain about his surroundings at every moment, despite his lack of sight. Sure. After his initial bumps and jolts as a kitten, all we had to do as compensation was to show him – show and tell – whenever we moved or added to the furnishings in any way, even if it was a minor piece of bric-a-brac on some table.

All we had to do, and usually it was Ellen with the time and patience, was to take him to the spot and “walk him,” a hand, a light hand, on the scruff of his neck, through, around, over, past . . . whatever, until he had learned the drill. Once he knew it, he never forgot. Not once after all those lessons did he ever knock over a single item, miss a flying leap, or walk into a jutting corner line – not that we ever saw, anyway.

He became even more of a “child,” I guess, because his had to be a world without fellow animal. We couldn’t, we didn’t dare, let him out of the house – too dangerous for him, and no place to be his own, out of our sight. So, he knew only us, the family . . . in the end, Ellen and me. So far as he knew, he was the same, human, practically.

His compensation was uncanny, really, and our visitors over the years, could never get over it when we thought to mention, as often we did not, that Hatcher was a blind cat. But then, that’s cats, uncanny, all right.

It was with many thoughts of sadness that we sold the big house, and large and looming among them was Hatcher, his days numbered as we packed up and sold off unneeded furniture, his world shrinking day by day too, for we shut off one room after another as the packing progressed, until in the end he shared with us only our bedroom, bath, and parts of the first floor such as kitchen, dining alcove, and hallways. He was, that last week, as uneasy and jumpy as either one of us.

The humane and fair thing, probably, right then, would have been to go ahead and get it over with, right? But, for one thing, neither of us could bear the thought. “Next week,” I told Ellen, “the day before the movers come.” And she nodded in agreement, pain in her eyes.

But the best laid plans . . . well, the day before the movers, that was the day she woke up early, still black in the morning, with the most severe pain she had ever felt. It doubled her over, and we both thought sure it was her heart.

But no, it was “only” gallstones, they told us at the hospital. Still, they had to come out, then and there, gallbladder and all, move or no move. And the whole business did come out. Laid her up for a week, although the surgery itself went fine.

Ellen of course missed the move, and just as well under the circumstances. But I didn’t and neither, it turned out, did Hatcher.

Between the hospital visits and conferences with the doctors, completing the packing and supervising the move, I just didn’t have much choice; I just didn’t have a moment, and . . . and I had to be almost cruel, pragmatic, and a bit hard-hearted at the least. All I could do at the end of that day was to remove Hatcher from the closed bathroom in the old house, litter pan and all, rush over to the new house, and plunk the poor fellow down in the upstairs bath there, before I hurried back to the hospital to visit with Ellen that evening. Foolishly, I suppose, I left the light on for the fellow, thinking it would help him “see” in his new surroundings.

Couldn’t face the new place alone that night, everything in boxes and so still, so I stayed in a motel near the hospital.

The next day, the doctor told me the surgery had been successful, and Ellen would be going home soon . . . only, only, they had noticed something else now, and probably it was best not to mention it right away, not now. Let her get over the surgery first.

I stayed in that motel a week, the whole week, waiting for her “to come home” with me, rather than face the place any sooner, by myself. Poor Hatcher bottled up remained in that bathroom the whole time too, although I dropped in on him every day, fed him and changed the pan from time to time, and even stroked and held him at moments. Still, in my grief already for Ellen, I didn’t really give him the attention he deserved.

Hatcher seemed to be surviving all right in the meantime, and I simply put off . . . put off the day, when I would “humanely” take him to the vet for the last time. For now, I figured, he was all right where he was. A bit confusing and lonely, yes, but no great harm – no matter what the house. He wasn’t going to break a leg in there.

Ellen never mentioned him as she was recuperating at the hospital, and I suppose she thought he was gone already; she didn’t want to think about it, about him – about Hatcher. Nor, with his time simply postponed, did I.

That last night, unthinkingly I guess, I must have left the bathroom door ajar or something, and there was Hatcher bounding down the stairs from some comfy perch somewhere – our bed, probably – bounding, sure-footed as . . . well, a cat.

And as we settled Ellen in for her recuperation at home, he was everywhere, both delighted to see us and busy, obviously exploring, too. We never saw him any happier, really, any more “at home.”

Towards the end, I’m quite sure, he was her chief comfort, other than the people in her life who were dear. In the end, because of her condition, only Hatcher could sleep with her in the same bed.

And now it’s he and I, and he’s my chief, my only comfort day by day and night, my only tie in this new home to her, to what had been and might still have been again – Hatcher. The cat on my lap. And to think, I can’t even remember how he came by his name Hatcher.

Friday, October 26, 2012

The English Language


The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English."

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c." Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k." This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f." This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas. If zis mad you smil, pleas pas on to oza pepl.

Friday, June 1, 2012

The Green Room

Green is the theatre’s most unlucky colour. This is so for several reasons:

It was once believed to be the fairies’ colour and therefore a superstition developed that it was not proper for mere mortals to wear it. Actors wearing green costumes were difficult to see against the green grass and foliage of outdoor settings, or the traditional green spotlight (the “limelight”) used in 18th and 19th century productions. Green is also a difficult colour to light properly.

Sitting in a totally green room before a performance was therefore believed to ward off the powers of this evil colour. That is why the backstage lounge is traditionally known as the Green Room, no matter what colour it is painted.

"Pat, pat; and here's a marvelous convenient place for our rehearsal. This green plot shall be our stage, this hawthorn-brake our tiring-house; and we will do it in action as we will do it before the duke."
—Wm. Shakespeare: A Midsummer Night's Dream (Act III, Sc. 1)


Monday, December 27, 2010

Excusatio Meus


In response to criticism from others that I tend to write too many words, I’m describing the complete narrative of Richard Wagner’s Ring Cycle in precisely 300 words, just to demonstrate that I’m capable of simplicity, brevity, and conciseness, and that I can condense something as immensely complicated, perplexing, and convoluted as Wagner’s madness, “Der Ring des Nibelungen,” The Ring of the Nibelung.

As a matter of fact, my little introduction here is also exactly 300 words, but I’m not calculating the words in the two titles in this total. So this is pretty damn concise, wouldn’t you say?

Wagner’s music is better than it sounds! Opera is a magic scene contrived to please the eye and the ear at the expense of understanding! Wagner’s operas consist of some wonderful moments but awful half hours!

Well, I’ve now solved that problem. Yes, it’s all you need to know about the entire 18-hour, 4-opera marathon (Das Rheingold, Die Walküre, Siegfried, Die Götterdämmerung) in only 300 words, which can be read in just two minutes, or less than one fifth of 1 percent of the time it takes you to listen to the whole damn cycle. I tried to reduce it to exactly the same number of words as Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, which is exactly 268 words, but it really doesn’t take any longer to read than that does. – Opera would be a lot more enjoyable if it wasn’t for all that vocal racket! Eat your heart out Metropolitan Opera Company!

So here you have it, the complete Ring of the Nibelung in just two minutes. It’s 300 words, right on the button. Sit back, and relax. Don’t bother making a cup of tea; you’ll be finished reading this before the tea is ready. Are you comfortable? OK, here goes:


Wagner’s Ring Cycle in (exactly) 300 Words:

Evil dwarf, Alberich, wants some Rhinemaiden action. When rejected, he steals gold and makes a powerful ring. Meanwhile, Godfather Wotan, who is somewhat full of himself, builds Valhalla with the help of two giants in exchange for Freia. Wotan thinks he’s sneaky enough to keep Freia: but it’s Giants 1, God 0.

Nasty god, Loke, has a plan: steal ring and get Freia. Plan works, except for curse on ring. One giant kills the other and Wotan is warned bad times loom. He promptly sires two mortal children and eight Valkyries to collect warriors in hope of getting ring back.

The two kids, Siegmund and Sieglinda, get a little too cosy with each other (yuk), spawning Siegfried, who is a bit of a tool. Oh, and Siegmund finds magic sword in a tree and Wotan’s wife says Siegmund is a dog and must die. Über-Valkyrie, Brünnhilde, rebels and saves Sieglinda, who is taken in by the evil dwarf’s evil brother and promptly dies in childbirth.

Siegfried, who has no fear, is used by evil dwarf brother to challenge the remaining giant for the ring. Then he kills evil dwarf brother and sets off to find Brünnhilde, who’s no longer a Valkyrie but sleeps in a ring of fire. He breaks Wotan’s super-magic walking stick and it’s bye-bye Wotan, bye-bye God power.

Not content with Brünnhilde’s love, Siegfried leaves to be a hero. He’s fooled by a puppet king and his evil adviser, who happens to be the son of evil dwarf. There’s some very confusing stuff involving magic and marriages of people who aren’t who they say they are, but suffice to say Siegfried ends up with a spear in his back. Brünnhilde reclaims the ring and gives it back to the Rhinemaidens. Valhalla burns; Rhine rises.

Sad business, really.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Lessons From My Grandmother


Sweet are the uses of adversity;
Which, like the toad, ugly and venomous,
Wears yet a precious jewel in his head;
And this our life, exempt from public haunt,
Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in every thing.
–William Shakespeare, 1564-1616 (As You Like It: Act II, Sc. 1)

The Photograph

            When I was a little boy and all through my teenage years, I had a photograph of my grandmother sitting on my dresser in my bedroom. It was a colour photograph taken somewhere in the countryside near her home in Cobourg, Ontario sometime in the 1950s. In it, she was wearing a flowery, blueprint, “grandmotherly” dress and she was staring directly into the camera with an all-knowing enigmatic smile on her face. Her face was lit up and her eyes sparkled, but her smile was amazing. The best way to describe it is to say that it was a “Mona Lisa” type smile that enticed me to guess what was on her mind. I loved that photograph and I gazed at it every day for many years.
            I was her oldest grandchild, so that she and I felt close to each other. After she died, I became convinced that she was trying to tell me something in that photograph. I was certain that she was giving a message to me, and uniquely for me. No matter how often I looked at it or thought about it, I was never able to decipher the message which I was convinced was there. Later, after I finished high school, I went to a university away from home, my parents moved to a new town, and that photograph was packed up and became long forgotten. My moving to university was in fact a leaving of the nest for me, and I completely forgot about that photograph. It was almost thirty years before I thought of it again.

Mary and Ed

            My grandmother was born Mary Isabella Oliver on October 14, 1889 to a large farm family on their farm near Chatham, Ontario. There were three boys and three girls in the family and she was the fifth of the six children. The second born was her brother, Ed. He was born Edmund H. Oliver in 1882. It seems typical that all farm families are close to each other, but out of all of them, the two who were the closest were Mary and Ed, in spite of their age difference. Right from the moment of her birth, something about Mary seemed special to Ed and for the rest of their lives they felt particularly close to each other.
            As an adult, Ed was an educated man. He graduated from high school with the highest marks of any student in the province. At the University of Toronto, he majored in Classics with English and History thrown in for good measure. Graduating at the head of his class, he went on to earn his Masters, later earned his PhD at Columbia, and eventually became the Moderator of the United Church of Canada. Because of his fondness for his little sister, he encouraged her to pursue her education too. Ed had gone out to western Canada to become principal of St. Andrew’s College at a new university, the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, and because of Ed’s influence, Mary decided to continue her education there. At the university, one of her friends and colleagues was John Diefenbaker who later became Prime Minister of Canada in 1957. In fact when she died, he was the Prime Minister and my father received a very nice personal letter of condolences from him. It was also here at university that she met her future husband, my grandfather, Frank Percival Lloyd. (I was named after his father.)
            Her field of study was literature, because she always loved language and the power and beauty of words. She knew Latin and Greek, as well as English and German literature. One of my memories of her was that when I was a young boy, she constantly corrected any mistake in grammar I made when speaking. She simply would not allow me to use words in careless or unclear ways and was insistent that I express my thoughts clearly even when I was very young. (I hope I have been able to live up to her expectations.)
            It was unusual for a woman to be a university graduate in those days before World War I, but she in fact was the very first person upon whom the University of Saskatchewan conferred a degree. She was at the head of the first graduating class at the university and would have been a Rhodes Scholar had that been available to women in those days. It must have been a very proud occasion for both of them at the graduation ceremonies, as she walked across the stage to receive her degree with her dear older brother there on the stage too.

The War Years

            World War I broke out in the summer of 1914 and since my grandfather was younger than my grandmother (he was born in 1892), he waited until he finished his degree before signing up. He and my grandmother married in 1916, and then my grandfather was shipped over to Flanders Fields. Both his older and younger brothers were already over there, and his older brother had already been gassed in history’s first gas attack at Ypres in 1915 and although he survived the war, he died afterwards as a result of his wounds.
            Mary was now living at the family farm in south western Ontario when word was sent to my grandfather that she was pregnant. A tiny boy was born two months prematurely on January 17, 1917 back on the family farm near Chatham. A premature birth is serious at any time but it was especially so back then. There were no hospitals nearby and any medical care was unavailable too. There were no such things as incubators in those days either and with a very low birth weight, it was very doubtful whether or not this fragile baby could survive.
            Back in France, my grandfather and his younger brother fought their way up Vimy Ridge with the rest of the Canadians, but within a month, his younger brother was killed at the age of 21. Since his is an unknown grave, his name is today engraved on the Vimy Memorial in France, as well as in the Book of Remembrance in the Memorial Chamber on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Shortly after his brother’s death, my grandfather was severely wounded in August 1917 at Hill 70. He had received shrapnel wounds in the head. The shrapnel was pressing against the optic nerve and he was blinded.
            One can only imagine the fear and suffering that Mary had to endure while back in Canada. With her baby son fighting for his life and the news of her husband and brother-in-law’s wounds, and her other brother-in-law’s death, these must surely have been times of great fear, doubt, and anxiety. Her brother Ed was also in France serving as a Chaplain. (He was an Honorary Lieutenant-Colonel in the Canadian Chaplain Services, and had been honoured with a Mentioned in Despatches.) However, even though Mary had the rest of her family around her, it must have been a very lonely time.
            My grandfather was invalided back to Canada, but was determined not to let his wounds hold him down. Due to his war experiences, in which he saw much suffering in the trenches, he decided to devote the rest of his life to the relief of pain. He had already decided to do this since his degree at the University of Saskatchewan was as a medical doctor, but he now enrolled in medical school at the University of Toronto to take a degree in biochemistry, hired a graduate student to read his lessons to him, and memorized everything. The shrapnel in his head was inoperable but eventually it moved and his sight returned. However, for the rest of his life he suffered severe headaches. He graduated with his post graduate degree in medicine, and set up a medical practice in Cobourg, which became the family home for the next two generations.
            He was a successful doctor in general medicine with special interest in radiology and surgery, but joined the army again in 1939 to mobilize and become the Commanding Officer of the 4th Field Artillery in England in World War II. He was transferred back to Canada in 1942, promoted to Colonel to train medical officers at Camp Borden, and was awarded the Order of the British Empire for his service to his country. After the War, he returned to his medical practice and founded the Medical Centre in Cobourg. He lived until 1964.
            Between the Wars, Mary had three more children, all girls. As for the tiny premature baby boy, it is my understanding that he survived, – because he was my father. He too joined the army as a sergeant in his father’s regiment in World War II, was much beloved by his comrades, married his childhood sweetheart (my mother who had also joined the army to go overseas), and returned to Canada after the War to become a banker. He passed away at the age of 71 on June 12, 1988.

The Meeting

            Even though Mary had a family of her own, she and Ed still felt very close to each other. Ed died in 1935, after his tenure as Moderator of the United Church. Basically, what he did was to give so much of himself to those who had so little during the Great Depression that he essentially worked himself to death through exhaustion. Mary and one of her sisters could see what was happening, so they travelled out west to try to convince him to take better care of himself. But Ed would have none of it. He was spiritually happy and said that it was more important to serve God by helping those in great need, and his dedicated devotion was so exhausting that he eventually died. Mary was devastated at the loss of her dear older brother, but through her own love of God she accepted the loss and moved on with her life. However the pain of such a loss is always with you because it never completely goes away.
            About fourteen years later sometime around 1949, Mary had a severe heart attack. In those days there was no such thing as open heart surgery and there was little the doctors could do but make her as comfortable as possible. She was not expected to survive for long. Perhaps when our time comes, each of us recognizes it. I am certainly convinced that when my father died suddenly, he knew his time had come. We do not know the answer to that question because we have never been there, and those who have been there are gone, so that they cannot tell us what it is like. Nevertheless, Mary knew her end was near, but she was not troubled by this fact. On the contrary, she had lived a long life, raised four children, saw the birth of grandchildren, and was now joyful at the prospect of finally meeting her Maker.
            Late one night in the hospital, she went to sleep in the full and complete knowledge that the call had now come for her, and that she would not wake up. She was totally at peace. However, in the wee small hours of the morning, she felt a warm hand touch her on the shoulder. She opened her eyes and there standing before her with his hand on her shoulder was her older brother Ed, who had died 14 years earlier. Mary was absolutely astounded. She was completely at a loss for words. The two of them gazed at each other for several minutes with not a word being said between them. Finally, Ed spoke.
            He said, and I quote exactly, “Mary, what is the matter? Can you not lift just one more stone?” He then smiled at her knowingly, turned, and walked out of the room. She never saw him again. But she did find a way to lift one more stone because she surprised the doctors by recovering from her heart attack, and lived in reasonably good health after such an experience for another 12 years. I am so very grateful for that, because it was during these years that I grew to know her. She eventually died in Cobourg on April 19, 1961.

Woodlawn

            As a boy, I grew up several hours by car away from my grandparents, but my parents and I visited the family home often. The first 10 Christmases of my life were spent there and we visited at least every three or four months. They lived in a large home in Cobourg called, “Woodlawn.” It was a large wooded lot with many trees and flower beds. The house was built in 1835 and it was huge. Each room inside was like a big sweeping gallery.
            The front of the house had an open porch running the length of it, supported by six tall Greek-type columns. As you entered the house from the large oak front door, off to the right was a large dining room with a fireplace in it, and off to the left was a drawing room, also with a fireplace, with a small music room behind it. Down the hallway, the entrance to the kitchen was off to the right and another entrance to the music room to the left. Across the hall from the kitchen beside this entrance to the music room, was a winding staircase that led upstairs. At the bottom of the stairs was a large grandfather clock.
            Upstairs there were four spacious bedrooms, two of which had a sink and running water, and a bathroom at the back end of the upstairs hallway. One of the bedrooms, which was my father’s room when he was a boy and the room I usually used when we visited, required you to go down yet another hallway to enter it. At the front end of the upstairs hallway was a door that led to the outside open balcony which was directly above the front porch. There was also an attic above this floor but this was the only place I never explored because there was never a ladder available upstairs when I visited.
            Downstairs, at the far end of the hallway next to the entrance to the kitchen, was the entrance to the back porch, which was enclosed but was very long and deep, and at least the size of two large rooms. At the far end of the porch there was the entrance to the woodshed, coal bin, and the stairway to the cellar. At the other end of the porch on the outside, was a very small storage room connected to the pantry on the inside which in turn connected to the kitchen.
            Inside the house again, besides entering the huge dining room from the front hallway, there was also another entrance from the kitchen which was behind it, but out of sight. There was also another hallway running from behind the dining room by this entrance to the kitchen, down to what was once called the annex. At the end of this hallway were two small guest bedrooms, (one of which had a small balcony), with a bathroom off to the left and another hallway which led from the right into the very spacious family room with yet another fireplace. So there were three fireplaces in the house, each with its own separate chimney.
            There was a door in the family room that led directly outside to the front porch. There was a direct connection at the far corner of the family room to the two guest bedrooms and the bathroom from the rear. In the bathroom, there was a small door that led into a storage room and a laundry room which in turn led into the pantry, which in turn led back to the kitchen from the rear. So every room to the left of the main hallway was connected, and every room to the right of the main hallway was interconnected but this was not obvious upon first inspection.
            As a young boy, I delighted in exploring every nook and cranny of the house, the garage behind it, and the very spacious grounds which were completely encircled on three sides by a very long wooden fence. The fence was virtually hidden by all the bushes that grew along it. The front and back of the property were almost obscured by a dense thicket of bushes and trees. In fact there were trees everywhere, and this is why the place was called, “Woodlawn.”
            Outside behind the back porch was a large two room garage, which at some point in the past had been a stable or coach house. Each section could park two cars, so in effect this was a four-car garage. The two very large rooms of the garage were not connected so that you had to go outside to go from one to the other. There was a modest workshop beside the garage with a tool shed beside that, and a small stairway leading to a huge attic above the whole thing. Ivy and grapes grew in vines up one wall on the outside. I often snacked on these grapes.
            The front driveway was a circular driveway that led around the very large lawn to the front door and also branched off to run beside the right of the house to the back, where it circled around to the front of the garage. The lawns were spacious and wooded. There was the huge front lawn, another large lawn to the left of the house, another spacious one that completely circled the garage to the left, right, and behind. There were trees everywhere (oaks, elms, maples, and many others), and flower beds everywhere. It seemed that each of the trees had several birdhouses in them and there were bird feeders everywhere too, for my grandmother loved birds. A wide variety of different birds made their homes at Woodlawn and I spent many hours looking at them with my grandmother.

The Stone Fences

            I have digressed slightly in this story because I believe that a description of this house and the property helps describe the many happy hours of my childhood spent there. I slept in every room at one time or another and never tired of exploring every inch of the property. As a child, I used to sit and watch all the many birds that made their homes here.
            There was many a time when I visited my grandparents, that my grandmother would take me out alone for a drive into the country to go bird-watching. She taught me how to seek out all the different birds and how to recognize them and their calls. Only my grandmother and I were on these trips. Also on these trips, there was many a time that she would pull the car off to the side of the road and point out a stone fence to me, because for the rest of her life she loved stone fences, due to her meeting her brother Ed in the hospital and what he said to her. She would just stop the car, turn off the engine, and sit quietly. “Look, George,” she’d say to me, “Isn’t that stone fence lovely?”
            Of course I’d agree. This event occurred so often that in my innocent young mind, I thought that the whole world was infested with stone fences, which of course it isn’t. Because I was so young, I knew nothing of what my grandmother was thinking during these moments, since it would have been pointless for her to explain her thoughts to me. I would have never understood.
            But to her, stone fences were not barriers in the usual sense of what a fence is. Rather, they represent markers on the road of life. They are cool resting places. Each stone that has been lifted to make the fence is very heavy, but it is not a boulder. It is a stone, which although quite heavy, could nevertheless be lifted. Every stone was lifted not by any machine, but by human hands and through human toil and sweat. It took great determination, resolve, and inner strength as well as physical strength to lift each stone and place it where it now lay as part of the fence. For each stone that was lifted, there was that much more land cleared to grow food to feed us. These fences were places where we could sit and rest. In time, shrubbery tends to grow around such a fence and it is here that many birds come for shelter. Everything ties together, and to my grandmother, a stone fence represented the triumph of the human spirit over adversity. But I was told none of this of course. These were just quiet thoughtful moments of profound peace and beauty in my childhood.

The Lesson

            After my grandmother died in 1961, I long since forgot about those moments as I continued with my schooling. After I moved away to university, my parents also moved and all of these memories receded into the distant past in my mind. My father died in 1988 and three years later in 1991, I was talking to my mother when the subject of my grandmother came up. My mother asked me if I knew about the story of my grandmother, her brother Ed, and the stone fences. I did not, and it was only now, 30 years after my grandmother had died, that I was told this story.
            The relationship between my mother and my grandmother was a mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationship, but they were always very close. They had known each other since my mother and father were eight years old. Many is the time during my visits to my grandparents, that I would see my mother and grandmother privately talking over in the corner of either the family room or the drawing room. They had numerous never-ending conversations and it was during one of these that my mother was told this story. My grandmother told very few people this story. I don’t think she ever told my grandfather or her children, including my father, but such was her relationship with my mother that this story was related to her. And I was eventually told it 30 years after my grandmother’s death.
            As I was hearing this story, all of these long forgotten memories of my grandmother came flooding back to me. Suddenly, I thought of that long ago photograph of her that was on my dresser when I was a boy. I have searched high and low for that photograph. I cannot find it, but it really does not matter, because I gazed at it for so long for so many years, that every detail of it is firmly etched in my memory, even though I had not thought of it for about 30 years.
            Like a bolt out of the blue, it all became clear to me. Yes there was a message in it for me, and all these years later I finally got the message. For in the photograph, my grandmother is standing beside a stone fence.
            The message is that no matter how unfair life may appear to be (and it is unfair), no matter how bleak things may appear to be, no matter how black it might seem, no matter how hopeless some things can become, no matter how heavy is the burden we may unfairly be required to carry, it is always possible to lift just one more stone. That is what we must do: just lift one more stone. We may have to lift another one too, and another, and another. No matter, just lift one more stone. But we are also required to be joyful in doing this. It is not a burden, but a requirement of life.
            Somehow, I don’t think I’ve yet heard the last word from my grandmother.
            In 1950, after her heart attack, she arranged for a memorial plaque to be hung in memory of her brother, Ed, in Chalmers United Church in Chatham, Ontario which was the church the family had always attended. On the plaque is an inscription that applied to Ed, but I feel it also applies to my grandmother:
“Great in Mind, Joyful in Spirit, in All Things Faithful”

My Field Has Trees
by Mary I. Lloyd, 1889-1961

My field is bathed in Autumn sun.
It gently slopes to shimmering woods
And lies encircled with a thousand stones
Where pioneer men have toiled and stood.
While o’er the stones, vines twist and creep:
Blue grape, wild rose and bitter-sweet.

It’s quiet here; the grass is green
To rest upon; the water’s clear,
So stilly pass with scarce a sound
That all is peace; there is no fear
Of darkening valley far below,
Where breezes murmur, faint and low.

The goodly earth a promise gives
Of flowers listening for the Spring,
While overhead the blue jays call,
And yellow warblers flit and sing.
White clouds drift idly, pure and bright,
Cool shadows follow, dim and light.

My field has trees to shade the sheep,
Their branches yield both rod and stave
For shepherd hands to guide the flocks,
Where with their lambs they safely graze.
Here, sweet content and peace I find, –
This is the sanctuary of my mind.

Bibliography

Barnard, Lt.-Col. W. T. The Queen’s Own Rifles of Canada. Don Mills: Ontario Publishing Co. 1960.
Berton, Pierre. The Promised Land. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. 1984.
Blackburn, George G. The Guns of Victory. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. 1996.
______. Where the Hell Are the Guns?. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. 1997.
Esmund, Henry. Beaver Lodge. Toronto: The United Church of Canada. Ryerson Press. 1930.
Hiemstra, Mary. Gully Farm. London: McClelland & Stewart. 1955.
Leeson, Franca J. Puzzling Questions and Other Poems of Mary Isabella Oliver Lloyd. Toronto: 1996.
Lloyd, Mary I. The Scotch Settlement. Cobourg: personal essay, undated, probably about 1952.
______. Personal Letters and Poems. Cobourg: 1940-1958.
McBurney, Margaret and Byers, Mary. Homesteads. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 1979.
McCormick, J. H. Lloydminster. London England: Drane’s. 1924.
Mika, Nick and Helma. Historic Mills of Ontario. Belleville: Mika Publishing Co. 1987.
Reid, Helen Evans. All Silent, All Damned. Toronto: Ryerson Press. 1969.
Summers, Rev. Benson S. The Winning Frontier. Saskatoon: Address given to U. of Sask. 1960.
University of Saskatchewan. Annual Convocation. Saskatoon: May 1, 1912.


______. Yearbook. Saskatoon: 1912.
Wark, A. W. Personal Letter to Rev. E. H. Oliver. Vancouver, BC: Oct. 19, 1930.
Wetton, C. The Promised Land. Lloydminster: Lloydminster Times, 1955.

Files from the following newspapers:
The Chatham Daily News: Sept. 11, 1938.
The Chatham Daily News: May 22, 1950.
The Cobourg Sentinel-Star: Oct. 9, 1964.
The London Free Press: Sept. 17, 1930.
The Saskatoon Star-Phoenix: July 11, 1935.
The Star Weekly, The Toronto Daily Star: Oct. 17, 1959.